Afterwards, I asked the occupational therapist what would be
the outcome of a case like this. Her reply was not what I wanted to hear. I had
hoped for something different. She told me he would probably be confined to his
home for the rest of his life. My heart shattered. He is eighteen. He has so
much more life yet to live. I started to think about the options. What if he
did have a wheelchair, one that he could use when outside? Couldn’t he get
around that way? Answer: He will be dependent for mobility as he has little to
no arm function. (A mouth controlled wheelchair is clearly out of the picture
for financial reasons.) He lives in a village where the roads are less than
ideal for wheelchair mobility. And to leave the village he would need to take
the bus—mission impossible. He may be able to learn how to paint with his
mouth, and his family could sell the paintings. This was the one suggestion
offered for his future. And then my heartache grew a little stronger and a
little deeper.
This patient's story illustrates the vast difference in therapy services between India and the USA in terms of resources and financial means. His story crushed my heart. In the US, and even within affluent population here in
India, obtaining a mouth-controlled wheelchair would be an option. In the US,
he would be able to receive resources to help him finish high school and even
go on to get a college degree if he was motivated to do so. I had a young male
patient last week in A2 that is in the same situation as this young boy, only
he comes from a little bit of money. My A2 patient may very well go on to
finish his college degree. This Q3 patient will probably never leave his
village again.
** Note: I have received written consent from the patient to share his story.
Sad situation. Very difficult to give any answer to the question. appreciate your human touch while write this blog.
ReplyDeleteLord, do something bigger than we can possibly fathom! AMEN!
ReplyDeleteps show Emily why she is here? apart from to meet me and Alok? x